Current:Home > MarketsMissouri voters to decide whether to legalize abortion in a state with a near-total ban -Zenith Investment School
Missouri voters to decide whether to legalize abortion in a state with a near-total ban
View
Date:2025-04-14 11:11:51
Follow live: Updates from AP’s coverage of the presidential election.
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri voters will decide Tuesday whether to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution and undo a near-total ban on the procedure.
The measure would guarantee people’s right to make decisions about their reproductive health, such as whether to get an abortion, take birth control or get in vitro fertilization.
Voters in eight other states are determining whether to add the right to abortion to their state constitutions.
Missouri currently allows abortions only in cases of medical emergencies. There are no exceptions for rape or incest.
The amendment does not explicitly undo the law, meaning abortion-rights advocates would need to sue to overturn the ban if voters adopt the amendment.
If enacted, the measure would allow the state legislature to enact restrictions or bans on abortion after viability — a sticking point for some abortion-rights supporters. The term “viability” is used by health care providers to describe whether a pregnancy is expected to continue developing normally or whether a fetus might survive outside the uterus. Though there’s no defined time frame, doctors say it is sometime after the 21st week of pregnancy.
Advocates had worried that failing to include such limits would sink their chances of passing abortion protections. But others cautioned against giving the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature the power to enact regulations that could effectively end access to the measure.
The campaign, Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, ultimately made room for restrictions to late-term abortions in the Missouri amendment.
Just getting on Missouri’s ballot was an uphill battle. The Republican attorney general and auditor fought publicly over the estimated cost of the amendment.
Attorney General Andrew Bailey argued the amendment would cost $51 billion in lost tax revenue because allowing abortions could mean fewer residents. The auditor and judges disagreed, instead setting the cost estimate closer to $51,000.
And a Missouri appeals court last year ruled against Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft’s summaries of the ballot measures, which described proposed amendments as allowing “dangerous and unregulated abortions until live birth.” Judges ruled Ashcroft’s language was politically partisan.
Republicans nationwide have been trying for years to raise the bar for voter-referred constitutional amendments to be put on the ballot, as well as raise the threshold for those amendments to be enacted.
GOP infighting and a record-breaking, 50-hour Democratic filibuster in May killed the latest Republican push to make amending Missouri’s constitution harder, an effort that in part had been aimed at thwarting an upcoming ballot measure on abortion-rights.
Missouri requires a simple majority to pass constitutional amendments.
The latest challenge to the amendment was raised by abortion opponents and Republican state lawmakers who argued that voters were not informed about the list of abortion laws it could repeal. The Missouri Supreme Court disagreed, requiring Ashcroft to place the measure on the ballot.
Other measures on Missouri’s ballot include measures to legalize sports betting; allow a casino at the Lake of the Ozarks; raise the minimum wage gradually from $13.75 to $15 an hour and require paid sick leave; and to prohibit ranked choice voting.
veryGood! (273)
Related
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Even the Hardy Tardigrade Will Take a Hit From Global Warming
- VA hospitals are outperforming private hospitals, latest Medicare survey shows
- Ocean Warming Is Speeding Up, with Devastating Consequences, Study Shows
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Could the Flight Shaming Movement Take Off in the U.S.? JetBlue Thinks So.
- Tom Hanks Getting His Honorary Harvard Degree Is Sweeter Than a Box of Chocolates
- Nearly a year later, most Americans oppose Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- How Pruitt’s New ‘Secret Science’ Policy Could Further Undermine Air Pollution Rules
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Abortion care training is banned in some states. A new bill could help OB-GYNs get it
- A woman is in custody after refusing tuberculosis treatment for more than a year
- Opioid settlement payouts are now public — and we know how much local governments got
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- By Getting Microgrids to ‘Talk,’ Energy Prize Winners Tackle the Future of Power
- How Pruitt’s New ‘Secret Science’ Policy Could Further Undermine Air Pollution Rules
- Shawn Mendes and Camila Cabello Make Our Wildest Dreams Come True at Taylor Swift's Eras Tour
Recommendation
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
2022 was the worst year on record for attacks on health care workers
Scientists may be able to help Alzheimer's patients by boosting memory consolidation
Along the North Carolina Coast, Small Towns Wrestle With Resilience
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
His baby gene editing shocked ethicists. Now he's in the lab again
Senate 2020: In Storm-Torn North Carolina, an Embattled Republican Tries a Climate-Friendly Image
Are masks for the birds? We field reader queries about this new stage of the pandemic