Current:Home > MarketsRavens' Ronnie Stanley: Refs tried to make example out of me on illegal formation penalties -Zenith Investment School
Ravens' Ronnie Stanley: Refs tried to make example out of me on illegal formation penalties
View
Date:2025-04-13 02:53:26
The 2024 NFL season kicked off Thursday with the Kansas City Chiefs staving off the Baltimore Ravens, but the early story of the game was the illegal formation penalties.
On the Ravens' first drive of the game, the offense was flagged three times for illegal formation, twice on left tackle Ronnie Stanley and once on right tackle Patrick Mekari. One of the illegal formation calls negated a defensive pass interference on Kansas City, canceling what could've been a big gain of yardage for Baltimore. The Ravens were able to score thanks to a rushing touchdown from Derrick Henry, but it came with several struggles.
Stanley would get called for another illegal formation penalty in the second quarter, drawing the ire of head coach John Harbaugh.
Stanley said after the Ravens' 27-20 loss that he felt the calls were being applied unevenly and that he was being targeted.
"The way it was going through the game, you know, I really feel like they were trying to make an example and chose me to be the one to do that," Stanley told reporters. "As far as I saw, they weren't doing it on both sides of the ball. And I know that I was lined up in a good position in a majority of those calls they made."
PLAY TO WIN $5K: USA TODAY's Pro Football Survivor Pool is free to enter. Sign up now!
Why is illegal formation being called so often?
According to the NFL rulebook, the offense must have at least seven players on the line, including two eligible receivers. On the penalty plays, the referees deemed Stanley was too far behind the line of scrimmage.
Typically, the tackles have been given leeway to line up just a few feet behind the line of scrimmage, but the NBC broadcast mentioned looking for offensive linemen behind the line of scrimmage was a point of emphasis the league wanted referees to pay attention to coming into this season. That means offensive linemen throughout the league will be watched more carefully this season.
Last season, Kansas City tackle Jawaan Taylor was heavily criticized for how far off he appeared to be lining up behind the line of scrimmage, and he was flagged a few times for it.
Stanley said the Ravens understood that refs would be closely watching for potential infractions, but he maintained he did not believe he deserved to be flagged.
"We knew that they were going to make a new emphasis on the illegal formations," Stanley said. "We were talking to refs in OTAs, actually, and got pretty good clarification. We were doing a good job in OTAs, and then all of a sudden today - whatever calls they made (are) their decision, but it didn't feel consistent with what we were told from the other refs earlier on."
Former NFL stars chime in on illegal formation penalties
Regardless of whether people agreed the calls were correct or not, viewers were unhappy with the amount of penalties were called for it. Some notable former football players chiming in on the flags included J.J. Watt and Jason Kelce.
"Offensive linemen are going to hate that they are finally calling that penalty," Watt, the former defensive star, said.
"Man they are not messing around with these tackles alignments. And to be fair, Stanley is still to far back!" Kelce said.
The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.
veryGood! (953)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Adele fangirls over Meryl Streep at Vegas residency, pays homage to 'Death Becomes Her'
- Control of Congress may come down to a handful of House races in New York
- Horoscopes Today, November 3, 2024
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Mississippi man dies after a dump truck releases asphalt onto him
- Ohio State passes Georgia for No. 2 spot in college football's NCAA Re-Rank 1-134
- The Best Christmas Tree Candles to Capture the Aroma of Fresh-Cut Pine
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Old Navy’s Early Black Friday Sale -- Puffers, Sweaters & More Up to 77% off & Deals Starting at $3
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- James Van Der Beek's Wife Kimberly Speaks Out After He Shares Cancer Diagnosis
- Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office reviews officer altercations with fans at Georgia-Florida game
- Wisconsin voters to decide legislative control and noncitizen voting question
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- A former Six Flags park is finally being demolished after Hurricane Katrina’s devastation
- Wisconsin Senate race pits Trump-backed millionaire against Democratic incumbent
- Search for 4 missing boaters in California suspended after crews find 1 child dead and 1 alive
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Wisconsin voters to decide legislative control and noncitizen voting question
Florida prosecutor says 17-year-old suspect in Halloween fatal shootings will be charged as adult
2 human bones discovered in Philadelphia park with no additional evidence, police say
Trump's 'stop
Quincy Jones leaves behind iconic music legacy, from 'Thriller' to 'We Are the World'
You may have blocked someone on X but now they can see your public posts anyway
Saving just $10 per day for 30 years can get you a $1 million portfolio. Here's how.